Your results are the only advice worth taking
Generic short-form advice is written about strangers. What your own last thirty posts did is a measurement of the actual people who will see the next one.
Why it refuses to speak most of the time
With six posts, “the ones with questions did better” is a coin-flip dressed as a finding — and a lesson stated confidently will make every future caption worse in a way nobody can trace back to it.
So three things all have to be true before your results are used at all: enough posts to have a pattern, a clear gap between the best and worst, and enough reach to have measured anything. Six posts that all got four views is not an experiment.
What it does and does not do
It shows examples
Your best and worst performing posts, with their real view counts and hashtags.
It draws no conclusions
“These did better, these did worse” is what the data supports. “Questions work” is an inference that needs the video in front of it.
It costs nothing extra
The performance data is already collected. Reading it adds no processing to writing a caption.
Questions about this
What if I have just started?
Nothing happens, and nothing is claimed. A new account has no results to learn from, so captions are written from the video and your topic alone until there are enough posts to be worth reading.
Does it need me to connect analytics?
No separate analytics tool. It reads the view counts FleetClip already collects for posts it published.
Try it on one topic
Ten videos a month on the free plan, three connected accounts, no card. Enough to see whether what it makes is worth posting.
Start free